Well, I've seen two penises in my life, and frankly, I couldn't answer your question at all. Not from personal experience anyway. From watching porn, I'd say cut. *shrugs* But really, right now? I'd have to say pussy, so... *giggles*
And that ought to teach you a lesson: never ever ask a question that will drive me to ramble with a lot of TMI, because I have no shame. ;-)
And that ought to teach you a lesson: never ever ask a question that will drive me to ramble with a lot of TMI, Oh no, on the contrary, my dear: the question was designed precisely to draw out TMI! *grins wickedly*
Also, to cater to preference: have Kajol instead of Orli's penis as icon. :-)
Well, thank you. I do believe Kajol is way way way prettier than Orli. *grins* Even though I unfortunately don't know enough about Bollywood to know who she is. But she makes me want to look into it. :-)
It's not like I feel terribly qualified as a penis tour guide. But:
I find foreskins rather erotic.
It makes me think of the head as like, the tender stamen of a flower over which the petals are usually closed, or the wet vulnerable centre of a shellfish -- that it's this delicate membraneous thing that requires a carapace in the usual course of things. The sense that the foreskin drawing back constitutes a whole new layer of nakedness beyond the mere exposure of the penis as a whole.
Hmm, t'husband is cut, and we were going to to do the Jewish thing to the boy, but then we watched the "care of the circumcised penis" video and Mr. M. was squirming. So we didn't do it, though oddly enough I ended up being the one who taught the boy how to wash his penis.
Well you know my opinion on this, but to delve into the murky subject once again...
1. Uncut is wider, which is better.
2. Uncut is designed right. The uncut cock moves in the right way at the right speed and to the right rythmn. It is just one of those happy coincidences (or evolution, as coincidences are more correctly known) that the cock needs the same pattern to get off as the cunt. The uncut cock is unaware of the rythmn and so goes off on the wrong pattern entirely.
From my personal experience, cut. But that's skewed a bit because I had a boyfriend who was not merely uncut, he had a LOT of foreskin, and even when he tried to be clean, he wasn't clean for long.
Also, there is evidence that circumcision provides some (certainly not total) protection against HIV infection, which is a plus. But it's mostly the aesthetic blowjob factor that leads me to say cut.
1. Uncut is wider? Excuse me, but not *that* much wider... I mean, how 'wide' is a foreskin? As in fore*skin*, not fore*fur* or fore*elephantine membrane*?! *cackles*
2. Now this sounds more intriguing. My pool of experience being small, I'm now wondering whether I'm not missing out on something here....
Why do all these tiggers equate uncut with big??? I mean, how f'ing big is a fore*skin*? It's not an Oriental rug! Or am I missing out on something here (as per usual)? *cackles*
It wasn't necessarily about sticking in one's body, that's the way the filthy, perverted Friends on my list interpreted it. I was asking in purely, er, maidenish manner, bien sur.
But I think she was mentioning bigness here as a separate issue to the foreskin: looking at the matter of the ideal cock from a broader (koff) perspective.
Your garrulous demands that posters defend themselves to each other are most amusing.
Hm, the rhythm question is interesting, but hasn't held true in my experience. The intercourse-only-no-hands orgasms I've had have mostly been supplied by cut men. Maybe it's related to internal shape somehow? Although I think that's more the general shape of the cock, nothing to do with foreskin.
Thank you for giving me a reason to sort through all my lovers to answer thisquestion! Pleasant memories!
Foreksins are now dancing across my mind's eye in a deeply inconvenient manner. I am ovulating - always a dangerous moment - and in a different country to The Beloved and his, er, member.
About whose status I shall remain uncharacteristically silent, thereby giving me an entirely unearned halo of maidenly reserve.
Your garrulous demands that posters defend themselves to each other are most amusing. Oh yes, tie spurs to their heels and set 'em fighting. It's a cockfight out there, honey.
*falls over, hit over head by own pun*
And did I ever ask for specifications for the 'ideal' cock? Not I! All I asked for was cut / uncut.
The intercourse-only-no-hands orgasms I've had have mostly been supplied by cut men *screams with jealousy*
Where do you find these men? And how did you train them up to deliver these goods? I have never, ever... hm, tmi here but that's what this kind of thread will lead to, isn't it?
Yes, I think TMI is inevitable, because it's not like we can whip out scientific studies to support our tastes in foreskin!
The power to come during intercourse only is something that I've found lies within me, not the guy. The main thing required of the man is to keep it up fast and long enough for me to find my way up the mountain so I can fall off, although the shape of his cock and the position (missionary or doggy are best, the sideways ones don't work as well) do seem to make a difference in how easy that is. I just suddenly could, around age 30 - it seems to be related to being relaxed, it helps if I can make noise or at least pant, and it's usually not as intense an orgasm as if I have direct clitoral stimulation. I just find the pleasure and consciously expand it, turn the volume up.
Eep, how's that for TMI? But hey, sharing information about having orgasms can't be a bad thing, right?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-27 11:06 am (UTC)And that ought to teach you a lesson: never ever ask a question that will drive me to ramble with a lot of TMI, because I have no shame. ;-)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-27 11:16 am (UTC)Oh no, on the contrary, my dear: the question was designed precisely to draw out TMI! *grins wickedly*
Also, to cater to preference: have Kajol instead of Orli's penis as icon. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-27 11:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-27 01:40 pm (UTC)And I'm not picky about whether they're real or not (see icon.)
Actually, sometimes the fake ones are more fun, because you have a whole other world to explore once you get bored!
is that TMI enough for you?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-27 02:00 pm (UTC)Well, the day they develop *hooded* dildoes, I will call myself Sea anemone.
Eep, and don't tell me they exist already!
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-27 02:04 pm (UTC)Sea anemone :D
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-27 02:08 pm (UTC)Please note that this uncut cock is erect and does not have a retractable foreskin.
I said 'hooded' not medically challenged.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-27 02:13 pm (UTC)I find foreskins rather erotic.
It makes me think of the head as like, the tender stamen of a flower over which the petals are usually closed, or the wet vulnerable centre of a shellfish -- that it's this delicate membraneous thing that requires a carapace in the usual course of things. The sense that the foreskin drawing back constitutes a whole new layer of nakedness beyond the mere exposure of the penis as a whole.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-27 03:35 pm (UTC)I'm not sure if that answers your question, but I remember the sex, even 13 years later.
*grins*
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-27 05:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-27 11:41 pm (UTC)1. Uncut is wider, which is better.
2. Uncut is designed right. The uncut cock moves in the right way at the right speed and to the right rythmn. It is just one of those happy coincidences (or evolution, as coincidences are more correctly known) that the cock needs the same pattern to get off as the cunt. The uncut cock is unaware of the rythmn and so goes off on the wrong pattern entirely.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-28 03:14 am (UTC)Also, there is evidence that circumcision provides some (certainly not total) protection against HIV infection, which is a plus. But it's mostly the aesthetic blowjob factor that leads me to say cut.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-28 05:43 am (UTC)For admiring: uncut (and HUGE!)
For USING: cut, and resonable
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-29 02:55 am (UTC)However, this post has been very educational. *g* Thank you!
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-29 11:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-29 11:51 am (UTC)You are so wild,
Um, possibly I asked the question because I have had similar experience, and possibly also about 13 years ago... Ack, mindmeld again.
*smiles innocently*
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-29 11:52 am (UTC)Care of the circumcised penis video???? How does it need to be cared for? And there's a *video*? Or do you mean the just-circumcised penis?
Yeah, well, and the mother doing all the teaching... *rolls eyes* Plus ca change, eh.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-29 11:54 am (UTC)2. Now this sounds more intriguing. My pool of experience being small, I'm now wondering whether I'm not missing out on something here....
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-29 11:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-29 11:56 am (UTC)Hm, *ponders the smegma prob*
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-29 11:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-29 11:58 am (UTC)*guffaws innocently*
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-29 02:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-30 02:18 am (UTC)*hoots*
But I think she was mentioning bigness here as a separate issue to the foreskin: looking at the matter of the ideal cock from a broader (koff) perspective.
Your garrulous demands that posters defend themselves to each other are most amusing.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-30 02:20 am (UTC)*slinks away guiltily*
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-30 09:27 am (UTC)Thank you for giving me a reason to sort through all my lovers to answer thisquestion! Pleasant memories!
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-30 07:52 pm (UTC)About whose status I shall remain uncharacteristically silent, thereby giving me an entirely unearned halo of maidenly reserve.
*does nun-like smile in a wimple*
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-31 11:15 am (UTC)Oh yes, tie spurs to their heels and set 'em fighting. It's a cockfight out there, honey.
*falls over, hit over head by own pun*
And did I ever ask for specifications for the 'ideal' cock? Not I! All I asked for was cut / uncut.
*looks entirely innocent*
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-31 11:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-31 03:17 pm (UTC)*screams with jealousy*
Where do you find these men? And how did you train them up to deliver these goods? I have never, ever... hm, tmi here but that's what this kind of thread will lead to, isn't it?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-31 09:15 pm (UTC)The power to come during intercourse only is something that I've found lies within me, not the guy. The main thing required of the man is to keep it up fast and long enough for me to find my way up the mountain so I can fall off, although the shape of his cock and the position (missionary or doggy are best, the sideways ones don't work as well) do seem to make a difference in how easy that is. I just suddenly could, around age 30 - it seems to be related to being relaxed, it helps if I can make noise or at least pant, and it's usually not as intense an orgasm as if I have direct clitoral stimulation. I just find the pleasure and consciously expand it, turn the volume up.
Eep, how's that for TMI? But hey, sharing information about having orgasms can't be a bad thing, right?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-06 03:02 pm (UTC)Hah, I'll let you know once and if I ever have any luck in this department. :-D
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-07 11:31 pm (UTC)