it's academic, my dear love toy
Oct. 26th, 2008 01:10 pmI just posted this i a comment but it occurs to me that it might make a pithy post, also. So: waste not, want not, I say, and recycling (comments) can't be bad for the planet! This is to do with recent academic fan debates wot i have to admit, i have only followed at second hand. Which does not stop me from having views on it, of course!
I am puzzled by this notion of 'influence and rhetorical power'. One part of me nods and thinks, of course, because I have a Ph.D. and teach students in a university and occasionally give research papers, I am so much more articulate than the common rabble out there in my local supermarket. Another part of me wonders where the reality of all this comes from. Teaching students means I constantly have to school my words and simplify them so that they can understand so I don't seem to be wielding much rhetorical power -- although I do like to think I am moulding young minds, hah, but I'm not sure that's what the ranters have in mind. I teach at a crap university. I get paid less than the local area manager of McDonald's (where's the influence?). My department was closed down so I get to talk to fellow-academics in my discipline maybe once a year, if lucky, and the other academics in my institution talk about anything but high-falutin' stuff: it's all about marksheets and retention figures and recruitment drives and re-sit statistics.
I do like to talk clever but is that because I'm an academic or is that because I'm me, and because I'm me and I love words, I chose this profession to begin with? (Only to wake up disillusioned 15 years later...) And I can talk mighty clever with people who are not academics at all, and a lot of those are on my Friends list, and they are very rhetorically persuasive and witty.
Also, I love novels and fiction (duh, why else be in slash?) And most novelists are not academics (although some are, and why not?) But all novelists, be they academic or not, are persuasive and rhetorically sophisticated.
As to influence? *sighs* That seems to be another kettle of fish, not to do with academe at all, but with the whole BNF thing. Which requires blood, sweat and tears, obsession so that you put in the time, and a network as wide as the world. People cleave to BNFs, it seems to me, because they love them. It's not some evil mysterious 'influence'; it's fans actively choosing to follow that person around because they're getting loads out of her. And once they stop getting loads out of her, they either become her friend and stick around, or they flit off to other pastures. And what's wrong with that?
I am having an academic identity crisis!! I've been having it for years! Will it ever stop???
I am puzzled by this notion of 'influence and rhetorical power'. One part of me nods and thinks, of course, because I have a Ph.D. and teach students in a university and occasionally give research papers, I am so much more articulate than the common rabble out there in my local supermarket. Another part of me wonders where the reality of all this comes from. Teaching students means I constantly have to school my words and simplify them so that they can understand so I don't seem to be wielding much rhetorical power -- although I do like to think I am moulding young minds, hah, but I'm not sure that's what the ranters have in mind. I teach at a crap university. I get paid less than the local area manager of McDonald's (where's the influence?). My department was closed down so I get to talk to fellow-academics in my discipline maybe once a year, if lucky, and the other academics in my institution talk about anything but high-falutin' stuff: it's all about marksheets and retention figures and recruitment drives and re-sit statistics.
I do like to talk clever but is that because I'm an academic or is that because I'm me, and because I'm me and I love words, I chose this profession to begin with? (Only to wake up disillusioned 15 years later...) And I can talk mighty clever with people who are not academics at all, and a lot of those are on my Friends list, and they are very rhetorically persuasive and witty.
Also, I love novels and fiction (duh, why else be in slash?) And most novelists are not academics (although some are, and why not?) But all novelists, be they academic or not, are persuasive and rhetorically sophisticated.
As to influence? *sighs* That seems to be another kettle of fish, not to do with academe at all, but with the whole BNF thing. Which requires blood, sweat and tears, obsession so that you put in the time, and a network as wide as the world. People cleave to BNFs, it seems to me, because they love them. It's not some evil mysterious 'influence'; it's fans actively choosing to follow that person around because they're getting loads out of her. And once they stop getting loads out of her, they either become her friend and stick around, or they flit off to other pastures. And what's wrong with that?
I am having an academic identity crisis!! I've been having it for years! Will it ever stop???