viggo in motion
Jul. 7th, 2002 03:34 amNote the time of the post: 3.35 a.m.! Why? Because I actually did watch the Viggo movie, as per Demelza's instructions! It's her fault! I wouldn't even have known it was on!
It's Demelza's secret Viggo-lust expressing itself vicariously through hapless victims all over the UK.
Verdict: the movie was shite. (Was it called Glass Darkly or something?)
Redeeming features: Sex scenes. I zapped away the wooden bimbo entwined around Viggo and imagined Sean Bean and "Twee Sluts"! (Thank you,
I concede the following points: Viggo in motion is better than Viggo in pic. He does have a good bod. Not sure about the acting or about the puppy-dog eyes. Pity about him not saying anything in this film.
I must be ill. I cannot believe what I am saying or doing re Viggo.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-07-07 12:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2002-07-07 03:22 am (UTC)The bizarre chat with you (http://www.livejournal.com/users/lobelia321) at 3.30am (about how wonderful Viggo is) was a bit bizarre, though! Never thought I'd see the day...
::wanders off shaking head::
bizarre
Date: 2002-07-07 03:28 am (UTC)Re: bizarre
Date: 2002-07-07 04:32 am (UTC)Re: bizarre
Date: 2002-07-07 05:01 am (UTC)Ergo: desist from self-flagellation!
(no subject)
Date: 2002-07-07 03:53 am (UTC)It is not my fault, don't blame it all on me! I only put the times up because I knew everyone would ask me for them if I didn't and I am a kind and generous, non Viggo-loving soul.
Well, pah on all of you.
I still hold firm. Not even moving Viggo can make me change my mind. I have principles and I stick to them; unlike some people round here...