to cut or not to cut

[lobelia321]

Now, some people like to ramble on at length without a single LJ-cut; they like to wind their way down my Friends-page, leaving a long block of solid colour at the left-hand margin.

But some other people like to be succinct and mysterious and put or even , or pepper their post with






I used to be the latter and now I'm the former. Unless I'm posting . Which brings me neatly to my actual question:

Do you have a preference for cut or uncut?

And does this preference mirror your preferences in matters penile? Or is it confined solely to t'Living Periodical?

With me, it's the same in both realms: uncut and uncut.

Thank you. Over and out.

Indeed:

Hehhehe, you actually clicked on that last cut!!! Dudette!!!! The power of teh CUT!



No, not quite: if the result of a penile cut is a foreskin with no place to go (but the bin or the hospital incinerator), what then is the foreskin of LJ?

ETA: I just realised what the foreskin is! It is that text of the LJ cut text! When you click yourself through to the post to comment, all those little blue texts completely disappear into the ether!! Leaving the post bereft of major matter, much as the circumcised member is bereft of teh prepuce.


By the way, people who are reading this post only in its circumcised form: you'd better click yourself back to this post as seen on your Friends Page 'cos you ain't gonna understand it with half its bits missing, ya know.

*fiendish grin in shape of glans slit*

Comments

[noblerot.livejournal.com]

I like my LJs cut, baby. I like 'em clean. Whoa, liek squeaky clean.

[pecos.livejournal.com]

Lj's cut, men not.

Oh, and Hi. Yeah, you got me at the word penis. I'm funny like that. Who's the dude with the nice nads?

[lobelia321.livejournal.com]

That's Brad Pitt!

Goodness, woman, where have you been?

*gg*

[brightest-blue.livejournal.com]

As to the penis, I'm only familiar with the cut, but I have a feeling I won't mind the other,either!

As to LJ, it depends on the poster. If someone posts massively long posts three or more times a day, I appreciate a cut. If they post every now and again, no need to cut as far as I'm concerned.

*ogles Brad*

[lobelia321.livejournal.com]

Brad is totally ogleable.

Heh. T'h is the cut variety but t'lover from Bengal was uncut and I have a real soft spot for that. :-) (It was a revelation to me how moist men can be. I thought that was a woman thing.)

[brightest-blue.livejournal.com]

Moist? Men? *faints* Too bad it's too late for me to experiment. Or perhaps it's the perfect excuse to experiment . . . if I can convince hubby it's strictly scientific. :-)

[lobelia321.livejournal.com]

It's never too late to experiment. *g*

But, hm, that would require a longer post than I am currently up for. Titled 'My views on monogamy, marital faithfulness and pathetic penis count for my 42 years of life'

[brightest-blue.livejournal.com]

Oh, you MUST write it! You could even make a poll and everything! You'll probably get 200 comments!