gift snippet for fragilecat
May. 1st, 2006 06:53 pmFor
fragilecat who asked for this:
Radek and Rodney would be sooo nice
for style, i don't really care... but maybe Radek first person :)
I don't really know you, Fragilecat, and the stylistic prompt is kind of vague but here goes. *g* Having now written the snippet, I found that it lent itself to some meta-musings on personhood. :-)

I am the first person of my universe.
I am Radek. I am. I am. I am the first person of my universe. I am the person who is first in my head. Já. Já jsem. Sum ego. And this is not only in grammatical sense.
Is strange to think that for others I am not I. For Rodney I am not I. For Rodney, I am nobody. I am third person stupid engineering guy.
For Rodney, he is the I. He is his own first person. First person in all universe. The eye of his I.
Nothing so aggravating as megalomanic boss. Who gets persons all mixed up. Because, guess what, Rodney? In my head, here, in here, it is me who is the first person and you, you are maybe fourth person, if that. Fifth.
Eighty-ninth.
And the more you put on that face, the lower down you slip. Ninety-first. Ninety-second person on list of people to be saved from sinking Titanic by me, myself.
If he yells once more at my calculations, I am going to contact the union about this.
Well. Will only take eighteen months to get back to earth. Will have to go through complaints procedure, Form F-17, problems with line manager, interpersonal problems of a communicative nature.
First person. Third person.
Second person: You. Ty. Thou. And that is deictic. That changes. That is not fixed. Unlike he, unlike she, unlike they. No I without a you. I am. But I am nobody without you.
You are nobody without me.
Just you remember that, you arrogant annoying man! (Not that one can actually say that, not to one's superior, not really. But think it, yes.)
Or? Perhaps?
There always is?
We. First person plural. We the team. We the people and we the men.
Good enough.
Radek and Rodney would be sooo nice
for style, i don't really care... but maybe Radek first person :)
I don't really know you, Fragilecat, and the stylistic prompt is kind of vague but here goes. *g* Having now written the snippet, I found that it lent itself to some meta-musings on personhood. :-)
I am the first person of my universe.
I am Radek. I am. I am. I am the first person of my universe. I am the person who is first in my head. Já. Já jsem. Sum ego. And this is not only in grammatical sense.
Is strange to think that for others I am not I. For Rodney I am not I. For Rodney, I am nobody. I am third person stupid engineering guy.
For Rodney, he is the I. He is his own first person. First person in all universe. The eye of his I.
Nothing so aggravating as megalomanic boss. Who gets persons all mixed up. Because, guess what, Rodney? In my head, here, in here, it is me who is the first person and you, you are maybe fourth person, if that. Fifth.
Eighty-ninth.
And the more you put on that face, the lower down you slip. Ninety-first. Ninety-second person on list of people to be saved from sinking Titanic by me, myself.
If he yells once more at my calculations, I am going to contact the union about this.
Well. Will only take eighteen months to get back to earth. Will have to go through complaints procedure, Form F-17, problems with line manager, interpersonal problems of a communicative nature.
First person. Third person.
Second person: You. Ty. Thou. And that is deictic. That changes. That is not fixed. Unlike he, unlike she, unlike they. No I without a you. I am. But I am nobody without you.
You are nobody without me.
Just you remember that, you arrogant annoying man! (Not that one can actually say that, not to one's superior, not really. But think it, yes.)
Or? Perhaps?
There always is?
We. First person plural. We the team. We the people and we the men.
Good enough.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-01 06:09 pm (UTC)We. First person plural. We the team. We the people and we the men I'm melting!!! thaaaaanks it's good...
oh and if you wonder how I found you... say thanks to
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-01 09:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-02 10:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-01 06:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-01 09:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-01 09:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-01 10:32 pm (UTC)*sigh*
I love Radek. *stares dreamily into space*
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-02 11:04 am (UTC)I had a cute Radek icon and I seem to have deleted it in a fit of icon-deletion I had on Sunday. :-( And i'm at the wrong computer right now for re-uploading. (I'm sure you're rivetted by this.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-02 10:35 pm (UTC)And you're lucky, because I kind of thought the first person plural coming at the end was the point. It worked, anyway.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-03 11:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-03 08:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-02 09:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-02 09:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-02 09:42 pm (UTC)yeah, that (the Cadman fic) occurred to me as i was commenting. but i think i can handle it. :) it helps that it's a woman's voice (uh, sort of. heh). i have no defense for that opinion, it's not based on anything but my peronsal preference. i think mostly i only don't go for first person in fic because... it's usually bad. like crazy, inescapable mary sue bad. and somehow less believable than it would be in 3rd person.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-02 09:57 pm (UTC)I think first person is interesting because it allows the narrator to be outside the character's head. I find this quite hard to do with third person, I find it easier to crawl into a character's head but with first person it's kind of ready-made because the narrator is looking back on something he did earlier in life and reflecting back on it. Unless it's Cadman fic and present tense... but even so, I think there's a certain looking in at yourself from the outside in first person.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-02 09:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-05-02 09:42 pm (UTC)