short posts
Jan. 28th, 2009 11:56 pmThe new kids on the block, such as Facebook and Twitter, encourage very, very, very short posts. Shorter than txts.
What does the LJ etiquette say? If the post is to be short, do we rather not bother? Do you even bother to click 'comment'? Do you like it because, yawn, all that prose to read through? Or do you like it because we are all so twitterised now, we get confused by anything longer than 15 characters?
And the lj-cut? Make a pretend short post and then morph it, magically, into a tome of wondrous wafflitude behind the cut?
Haha, not really. Just a few more characters.
I hate the shortness of the new kids on the block. It frustrates the heck out of me. I want to rant and ramble! I want to muse and waffle! And while txt-fic is all very well and fun in its place, how on earth do people squeeze fics onto Facebook? Answer: they don't.
So what's the point? Why blog if yer can't fic?
What does the LJ etiquette say? If the post is to be short, do we rather not bother? Do you even bother to click 'comment'? Do you like it because, yawn, all that prose to read through? Or do you like it because we are all so twitterised now, we get confused by anything longer than 15 characters?
And the lj-cut? Make a pretend short post and then morph it, magically, into a tome of wondrous wafflitude behind the cut?
Haha, not really. Just a few more characters.
I hate the shortness of the new kids on the block. It frustrates the heck out of me. I want to rant and ramble! I want to muse and waffle! And while txt-fic is all very well and fun in its place, how on earth do people squeeze fics onto Facebook? Answer: they don't.
So what's the point? Why blog if yer can't fic?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 12:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 10:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 12:24 am (UTC)Facebook I use for finding old classmates and people I've met at conventions
LJ I use for fandom and fic.
Works for me ;-)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 10:20 pm (UTC)Aha.
Aha.
This all makes sense. The compartmentalisation of the online life! I am new to this and find it slightly scary. The scary thing is that Facebook knows me under my real name. I am not used to such out-there-ishness!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-30 03:16 am (UTC)"kidlet has decisively rejected ballet class. they will give us our money back. "
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-01 10:58 pm (UTC)This is pointless for LJ but it was fun to vent. As no Perse mums will ever read this.
I HOPE.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 01:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 10:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 02:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 10:21 pm (UTC)I am so with you. (Academics like to ramble. Oh yes, we do.)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 05:40 am (UTC)Why blog if yer can't fic?
Hear hear!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 10:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 08:57 am (UTC)Totally with you re: the search for even shorter.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 10:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 10:55 am (UTC)I will make a very short LJ post if it's something I want to start discussing (or want sympathy / constructive support about!)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 10:25 pm (UTC)Sometimes short LJ posts elicit the longest or the most comments. 'tis weird. I once posted a punctuation mark (was it a semi-colon?) and got loads of punctuation marks in response.
&!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 01:16 pm (UTC)b) Er, there is no b. I don't know why I felt the need to start with an a)
I'm not hugely fond of Facebook but it allows me to keep up with real life friends and distracts me and so on. I like Twitter for when I just want to say something short without thinking about it much (I do sometimes). It's brief and chatty and I find it fun. It has the immediacy of chat without the pressure. And I like LJ for stuff I want to put more effort into. Depends what mood I'm in really. I've never really seen the point of having all your tweets show up on LJ - the two things don't mix as far as I'm concerned. They're not meant to.
Also, I am far too addicted to all these things and need to spend less time on the internet. But that's just me... ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 10:29 pm (UTC)There is no b???? *wails, weeps and tears out hair*
This seems to be more or less msilverstar's line: the compartmentalisation of the online life. What confuses me is that my real name shows up on Facebook, and that my fingers automatically start typing LJ'ish type-things and then they have to remember: oh no! Colleagues can read this!!
Flylady twitters.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 10:44 pm (UTC)I'm sorry. ;(
What you see above is a winking sadface. It implies that my sorrow is perhaps not 100% sincere. I made it up. [ETA: I made up the winking sadface, not the sorrow. A percentage of that was real]
the compartmentalisation of the online life.
Yes, it can be confusing. But I've never yet found myself trying to post slash to Facebook, which is good.
There is an official Barack Obama Twitter stream. It doesn't do much now, but it does send you an email saying 'Barack Obama is following you on Twitter.' Which is cool. Not as good as 'Stephen Fry is following you on Twitter' though, because I know he clicked that 'follow' button himself, with his own hand. He said so on his blog.
Er. I do follow some people who aren't famous as well.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 11:18 pm (UTC)I love ;(!!!!!
It's so hard to type. And it makes my face contort in sympathy. And it has such a lot of character!
Aw, I love you, little guy! ;(
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 11:32 pm (UTC);(
Aw, he is rather sweet, isn't he?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 02:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 10:26 pm (UTC)Much better to eat a sea cucumber (or gherkin), *g*.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-01-29 10:45 pm (UTC)