lobelia321: (atoiletbrush)
[personal profile] lobelia321
On Monday, Radio Four (BBC talk radio in Britain) broadcast an interview with two women, one of whom is the new editor of something called 'Erotic Review'. This woman claimed that women cannot write erotica as well as men because they're just not that much into sex.

wtf ???

I feel too tired even to begin unravelling this absurdity. Although one part of me, hehe, grins in glee that the fanfic corner of our universe still seems to be a sekrit little niche. *g*



Link to the absurdity at Reuters
Listen to the absurdity at the BBC website (scroll down to 8:20).

One of these days I might post a few extracts from what passes for 'erotica' or 'porn' as written by men. If I can stop yawning long enough.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-06-18 10:51 pm (UTC)
ext_17864: (whatever)
From: [identity profile] cupiscent.livejournal.com
Someone else on my flist linked to this last night. It's really quite flabberghasting. What I said then was: "I faintly allow her point about dilettante amateurs. Sure, boys obsess about sex, more commonly to a degree that women probably don't. But they also obsess about robots, dinosaurs and cars, which doesn't mean they can necessarily write interestingly, intelligently or even coherently about them."

Baffled. As in, I am.

Profile

lobelia321: (Default)
Lobelia the adverbially eclectic

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    1 23
4 5 678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags