Grim times
Mar. 20th, 2003 10:30 pm1. Just had a very exhausting phone conversation (aka shouting match) with a friend who also opposes t'war but for quite different reasons from my own. This is what' difficult about this new world situation (as opposed to the nice, old clear-cut Cold War situtation - well, you know how I mean that, I hope). Even the opposition is a multifarious bunch and I don't want to be bedfellows with all of them, necessarily.
2. Possibly we are going down to London to demonstrate on Saturday. With the kids. Will a porta-loo fit into my knapsack?
3. On a more trivial note (and my thoughts have been veering wildly from war worries to nugatoriness all day - it's been difficult to concentrate, actually): I found some non-pouty Orli pics! See? I'm not so recalcitrant that I can' t be swayed by a few obviously non-fashion shoot pickeroonies. Especially the between-cars one is rather nice. (What is that strange woollen sausage around the man's neck?)
4. I also found some lovely pics of Karl and Viggo in a temple. But my favourite of the bunch is this one:
You gotta love both their poses!

5. On a non-war note, I discovered that my son is learning utter rubbish in school. In history, they are doing the history of the school! My god, how boring and pointless is that. At home he has a Greek history book and his father gives him research tasks like "What was the role of women in ancient Greek society?" No wonder he's bored out of his brain at school.
Still, they're weaving a felt placemat so that's a very transferable skill in case he's ever stranded on a desert island and needs to set a dinner table.
*bangs head on a placemat embroidered with the national curriculum*
6. TV news are crap. Radio is better.
7. My brain is so addled that I'm confusing the real war aims with the shenanigans of Geoffrey, Mr Wainthropp, Tony, George, Saddy et al.
2. Possibly we are going down to London to demonstrate on Saturday. With the kids. Will a porta-loo fit into my knapsack?
3. On a more trivial note (and my thoughts have been veering wildly from war worries to nugatoriness all day - it's been difficult to concentrate, actually): I found some non-pouty Orli pics! See? I'm not so recalcitrant that I can' t be swayed by a few obviously non-fashion shoot pickeroonies. Especially the between-cars one is rather nice. (What is that strange woollen sausage around the man's neck?)
4. I also found some lovely pics of Karl and Viggo in a temple. But my favourite of the bunch is this one:
You gotta love both their poses!

5. On a non-war note, I discovered that my son is learning utter rubbish in school. In history, they are doing the history of the school! My god, how boring and pointless is that. At home he has a Greek history book and his father gives him research tasks like "What was the role of women in ancient Greek society?" No wonder he's bored out of his brain at school.
Still, they're weaving a felt placemat so that's a very transferable skill in case he's ever stranded on a desert island and needs to set a dinner table.
*bangs head on a placemat embroidered with the national curriculum*
6. TV news are crap. Radio is better.
7. My brain is so addled that I'm confusing the real war aims with the shenanigans of Geoffrey, Mr Wainthropp, Tony, George, Saddy et al.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-20 03:45 pm (UTC)Heh. (Yes, I am ignoring the war in favour of pretty. This, I find, is the path to happiness.)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-20 04:13 pm (UTC)Don't worry too much about the loo situation, all the pubs along the route will be open.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-20 04:15 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-03-20 04:19 pm (UTC)That is entirely normal for me at the moment
(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-20 05:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-21 01:33 am (UTC)But don't they make a lovely tourist couple? Damn, I wish I weren't so bloody Karlvig-resistant so that I could slash this to pieces. But I *will* ogle. Make me smile, actually, those photos. I can't get over their *poses*. A lovely change from fashion poses.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-21 09:15 am (UTC)Make me smile, actually, those photos.
Me too. Ridiculously endearing. *muses* You know, I'm starting to think I like Viggo because he's a terrible poet, rather than in spite of it. Hmm... There's something very wrong there.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-21 10:22 am (UTC)Hah! The plot thickens! I love it. Yes, if we could twist his poetry into an endearing character trait, like Elijah's nailbiting, we could be onto something. *pats Viggo's shaggy head*
But mwuahha, the notion of him whispering sweet love poems into Karl's ear by the moonlit lotus pond...
(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-23 06:21 am (UTC)Oh, now. Stop that. Naughty person, you are. ['Karl, did you know you are to me like shards of frozen morning dew, burning reflections of distant suns exploding on my retina, shimmering forgotten vision of yesterday?' 'Yes, Viggo, you told me earlier - and what is your hand doing in my pants... Oh, right. Never mind.']
No, no, no...
(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-21 12:16 am (UTC)Sorry, I'm not very coherent when I just woke up.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-21 01:58 am (UTC)*cute*!
(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-21 09:24 am (UTC)My brain is also addled! I saw a little bit about Saddam on the news (well, yes, I watch it on TV. But I have Sky! We have to get our money's worth. Also I like to snark at the fakeness of it - "Just because they're showing footage of Iraqis surrendering, it doesn't mean they are!") and I had a little flash of "Oh, look, he and Mr Wainthropp would make such a cute couple!" Then I realised that I am, clearly, insane.
But if I am insane, I can, too, blame it on the National Curriculum. Namely the Year 9 Booster Kit for English that doesn't capitalise names of books correctly ("Enduring love") and suggests as a useful, productive and educational revision lesson for SATs that we *cut up the mark scheme* and get the kids to match up the criteria to the level. Clearly, one is not supposed to teach them anything about literature, but how to pass tests. Also, the Shakespeare tasks are ludicrous; one for Macbeth is "You recently read a review of Macbeth in the school magazine. Write a review of a play, book, film or game you enjoyed." Not a review of Macbeth, mind. I am so glad it's Friday!
(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-21 11:14 am (UTC)Wainthropp would make such a cute couple!" Then I realised that I
am,
clearly, insane.
Um. I can't disagree with your self-assessment there.
National Curriculum exercise:
Match the following symptoms with the appropriate points on the insanity scale.
1. T'war is clearly a gigantic jealousy tiff between Georgie, Saddie and Mr W.
2. Sad and Bob look *so* good together.
3. Geoffrey has uncovered a terrible conspiracy and hence languishes in a New Jersey gaol.
4. Orli's mouth is bigger than GWB's brain.
5. Decapitation refers to the swallowing of the head of the male sexual organ for purposes of erotic stimulation.
a. mildly insane
b. totally and utterly screaming mad
c. two shingles short
d. 3 1/2 shingles short
e. well-adjusted and rational
(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-21 02:20 pm (UTC)I am quite taken with no 4, though, and am trying to find ways of incorporating this into RL conversation (heh, and IRL, I got *disapproving looks* from other trainees when I told them about my anti-war poetry lesson. Yes! I thrive on disapproving looks. Bring them on!)
BTW, with recent developments, it strikes me that the Wainthropp oeuvre has moved from whimsical to wilfully esoteric. Will anyone else understand what's going on? Should they?
And with that, I shall desist from spamming other people's LJs in lieu of acually posting in my own...
(no subject)
Date: 2003-03-21 03:49 pm (UTC)<i>oeuvre</i> has moved from whimsical to wilfully esoteric. Will
anyone
else understand what's going on? Should they?</i>
Yes, I think *should* may well be the operative word here. I have no idea myself what to think of recent developments in the "oeuvre" (a label I highly approve of, *snort*) but can only refer ourselves back to t'insanity scale. I plead innocence: 'twas the war that did it, your honour, it addled me.
Let me just confirm something: Mr W and Geoffrey are *fictional*, right?